dr1 k562 cells (ATCC)
Structured Review

Dr1 K562 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 10797 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/dr1+k562+cells/pmc13168688-270-0-8?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 10797 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Whole-protein screening and multi-modal profiling of antigen-specific CD4 + T cells at single-cell resolution"
Article Title: Whole-protein screening and multi-modal profiling of antigen-specific CD4 + T cells at single-cell resolution
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-72396-7
Figure Legend Snippet: a Genetic design encoding the class II SCT protein. The MHC α and β chains are connected to the antigen through flexible linkers (L1, L2, and a partial invariant chain pIi), followed by purification tags (AviTag/HisTag). A secretion signal is placed upstream of the α chain to facilitate protein export. Created in BioRender . b Streamlined workflow for high-throughput SCT plasmid construction and protein expression. High-throughput production of SCT libraries is enabled by automated primer design and an optimized pipeline for plasmid assembly and protein expression/purification. Created in BioRender . c Flow cytometric assay to assess binding of SCT tetramers of various common class II HLA alleles to their cognate TCRs ( n = 3 ). Previously reported TCR-antigen pairs: DRB1*01:01 (DR1) – mutTPI 23-37 :T28I, DRB1*11:01 (DR11) – HIV Gag 299-311 , DRB1*07:01 (DR7) – ADM2 51–65 , DPB1*04:01 (DP4) – mutPly 427–441 (Supplementary Data ). d Comparison of the occurrence of aromatic residues F/W/Y in 2-mers that are positively correlated with SCT expression versus those that are negatively associated. The p value was calculated using Fisher’s exact test on the full 2 × 2 contingency table comparing F/W/Y presence across groups. e A 23-Element DRB1*01:01 CEFT SCT library. SCT expression was evaluated through SDS-PAGE. L, molecular weight ladder; +, protein standard for quantification of expression level. Schematics created in BioRender . f Antigen-specific T cells were detected through dual tetramer staining to enhance the true positive rate. An HIV Gag 41–56 SCT tetramer was used to exclude non-specific binding cells. A representative flow cytometry plot is shown. g Tetramer binding validation of 16 identified CD4 TCRs, each reactive to one of the five CEFT antigens (A–E) ( n = 3 ). Error bars represent standard deviation. h Schematic of peptide-pulsed activation assay. TCR-transduced NFAT-GFP Jurkat cells were co-cultured overnight with peptides and DR1-K562 cells. Created in BioRender . i T cell activation measured through the percentage of GFP+ Jurkats ( n = 3 ). P < 0.01 for each group relative to the negative control peptide. Statistical significance was determined by a one-tailed independent t -test assuming equal variances. All replicates are biological replicates. All bar plots ( n = 3 ) are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Purification, High Throughput Screening Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay, Comparison, SDS Page, Molecular Weight, Staining, Biomarker Discovery, Standard Deviation, Activation Assay, Cell Culture, Negative Control, One-tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a Design of an SCT library with overlapping 15-mer peptides spanning the entire RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. b . Schematic overview for the experimental workflow of high-throughput screening. 50 PBMC samples from 22 HLA-DR1+ participants were barcoded by timepoint, pooled, enriched for CD4 + T cells, stained with the 64-element SCT-dextramer pool, FACS-sorted, and sequenced. Single-cell analysis included RNA expression profiling, TCRαβ sequencing, antigen-MHC pairing, and timepoint identification. Comparison of genetic variants between transcriptome and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to demultiplex patient identity (Methods). Created in BioRender . c Correlation between SCT expression levels, quantity of antigen-specific cells captured, and predictions from class II antigen-presentation algorithms. SCT expression quantified prior to purification ( n = 2–4 biological replicates). Data were shown as mean ± SEM. %Rank_EL, percentile rank of eluted ligands. d Clonal and patient diversity in CD4 + T cell responses to each SARS-CoV-2 antigen. Antigens are color-coded based on their parent protein. e Tetramer binding validation of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 TCRs. A representative subset of SARS-CoV-2 TCRs ( n = 10) from Fig. 2d were selected and validated through SCT tetramer binding assays with biological triplicates. A DR1-restricted influenza A M1 17–31 SCT was used as the negative control. f Peptide-pulsed activation of SARS-CoV-2 CD4 TCRs in NFAT-GFP Jurkats ( n = 3). e , f P < 0.0001 for each group relative to the negative control peptide, determined by one-tailed independent t -test assuming equal variances. Exact P values are provided in the Source Data. All replicates are biological replicates. All bar plots ( n = 3) are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: High Throughput Screening Assay, Staining, Single-cell Analysis, RNA Expression, Sequencing, Comparison, Expressing, Immunopeptidomics, Purification, Binding Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Negative Control, Activation Assay, One-tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: a Antigen coverage across oncogenic proteins E6 and E7 in the SCT library for whole-protein screening. Left panel schematics created in BioRender . b Schematic overview of TCR repertoire profiling integrated with other key modalities. Created in BioRender . c Antigen specificity validation of HPV-specific CD4 TCRs (H1–H5) through tetramer binding and peptide-pulsed activation assays ( n = 3). **** P < 0.0001, * P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05 labeled for each group relative to the negative control peptide. d Polyfunctionality of TCR-transduced primary CD4 + T cells assessed by cytokine production (IFNγ, TNF, IL2, and GZMB) via ELISA assay following antigen stimulation ( n = 3). OD 450 values were normalized to TCR expression levels across each cytokine. **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, and unlabeled tiles indicate P ≥ 0.05, all relative to negative control peptides. e Cytotoxicity of TCR-transduced CD4 + T cells against DR1-K562 cells pulsed with cognate HPV-16 E6 peptides, monitored over 42 h ( n = 2). The heat map summarizes mean target cell killing at the 42-h time point. Non-cognate peptides served as negative controls for each TCR. f Cross-reactivity of TCR H2 and H5 against human self-antigens ( n = 2). H2- and H5-TCR-transduced T cells were co-cultured with LCLs pulsed with peptides identified from BLAST search and motif scans (Supplementary Data ). H2 TCR used a single 1 µM dose; H5-TCR was dose titrated at 1, 2, and 10 µM. g Alloreactivity screen. H2- and H5-TCR-transduced CD4 + T cells were tested against 41 LCL lines representing 92 distinct class II HLA alleles ( n = 2). DRB1*01:01-positive LCLs ( n = 4) pulsed with peptide L-2 (E6 91–107 ) or F-2 (E6 129–142 ) served as positive controls. Alloreactivity of H5 to HLA-DRB1*13:05-positive LCLs is marked with arrows. h Confirmation of H2 TCR reactivity to naturally processed E6 antigen. DRB1*01:01+ LCL (GM17281B) was titrated with full-length E6 protein (0–10 μg/mL), co-cultured with H2 TCR-transduced CD4 + T cells, and evaluated for IFNγ secretion ( n = 2). A DRB1*01:01- LCL (GM12244A) served as a negative control. Statistical significance was determined by a one-tailed independent t -test assuming equal variances. All replicates are biological replicates. All bar plots where n = 3 are presented as mean values ± SD. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Binding Assay, Activation Assay, Labeling, Negative Control, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Cell Culture, One-tailed Test